Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Apple picking

We went apple picking today... sort of.  Its a bit nostalgic for me- I haven't ben apple picking since I worked at a research orchard almost a decade ago.  Anyway, this wasn't quite like that.  One of the moms owns a farm with apple trees lining the long drive up to the barn.  The farm was only about three miles away, so that was nice too.  The trees are old style trees, so the apples are high- which is a bit of a challenge without picking ladders.  She had some really tall ladders, but they were very hard to maneuver into the trees.  Still, we got some apples picked.

The apples will be good for applesauce- though I was very impressed with the kids who showed no qualms in eating quite blemished apples.  The most blemished and small we threw to the horses who's pasture bordered the apple trees.  The kids just needed to put them over the fence.  My little star loved watching the horses eat the apples.

The mom gave all the kids who wanted them pony rides, but my little star didn't want to.  I was only slightly surprised.  I figured now that he liked the carousel he'd be ready for a little pony, but perhaps he needs to watch people riding for a few years first.  I was a bit disappointed because how many times do you get to do your own personal pony riding without paying or waiting in a very long line?

Anyway, it was a pleasant morning, hanging out, picking a few apples, watching really cute kids and horses.  And did I mention, it was a fall day- sort of damp, but the rain was over, and it was not very cold.

Typing seems to be really bothering my tendonitus, so that's all for today.

Monday, September 19, 2011

New shoes

I got new shoes today!!  You are wondering why I am so excited.  Its a been a long time since I bought shoes (not counting the shoes my mother in law got me for the wedding)... at least six years-I know I bought some in Maryland when we used to live there.
I attempted to buy some in CA, but I couldn't quite find the replacement for the shoes I love that I used for everything- walking, lifting weights, slipping on... well, their main limitation was not being warm, and not being suitable for running... or heavy hiking.  So I really couldn't find the shoes meant for EVERYTHING except snow, allow for orthotics and still slip on your feet.  However, I was pleased to find hiking/sneaker shoes, so they should be good for most things even if they don't slip on.  I think they actually FIT me with orthotics... they might need to be broken in a little.  And they were cheap- NOT, I was just kidding, but seriously I don't expect good shoes to be cheap... I'd probably be suspicious if they were.  However, I did find a local shoe store, that I didn't know existed- its only been here for two years.  It had Clarks (used to be a great shoe... but it used to be made in England), and Merrills- a brand I've had good luck with. Well you know how often I buy myself shoes!  Maybe I can even by my son some shoes at that store.

I just bought him some new shoes online, but I have a feeling this might be the last time I can do that.  This is the first time ever he WORE out the shoes before he grew out of them- the inside was falling apart, though the soles were only worn thin in a few strange places.  I think he has weird feet based on the strange way he wore them out.  They were not cheap shoes (though in looking for replacement I was surprised to find they were not the most expensive shoes either- I had thought I was buying him really expensive shoes and that perhaps that was kind of stupid) The brand I usually buy him (buying the same brand assures me that the next size will fit him and that I like the style) seems to be either going out of business, or if we are lucky, being taken over by the parent company (basically the same shoes, just smaller).  In any case I seem to have bought the only size 11 shoes made by either company last week.  I just wish they'd offer brighter colors for the boys.

I still like the styles they offered better than any competitor.  Velcro fastening (excuse me "hook and loop"), relatively flat- so it won't hit any arches in a funny way, good soles, leather- so it was water resistant.  I figure if I take my little star shoe shopping, not only won't he really know if they fit right, but he certainly won't be able to tell me.  And he probably won't want high quality shoes- like most kids, he'll certainly go on pretty appearance rather than how well it fits, price, how long it will last... How could a preschooler have a clue on these things?

And the rest of the day... I went to the gym, bought groceries, and went to the library to arrange a meeting room, and get some books for my little star.  A slow day with accomplishements.

Friday, September 16, 2011

Time Banks

OK, I read another article (below) and thought- how cool is that?

Published: September 15, 2011
In this time of high unemployment, time banks, which let people exchange skills and services, are more valuable than ever.
Maybe we could set one up here, in addition to a toy library at the science play space I want to create.  Its not completely a new idea (equivalent time for different types of work) for me, but its a new way of carrying it out- and much simpler than Ithaca-hours.  Ithaca-hours are quite similar in that each hour (equivalent to $10- at least when I left) represents and hour of work. All types of work are equivalent, and represented by and Ithaca-hour- an actual form of legal currency  with an exchange rate.  Most businesses in Ithaca will only accept a certain percentage of their price in them, and not all accept it.  

The time bank is a much simpler system- ie no currency, no exchange with real money, so it seems MUCH easier to set up.  I was trying to think about the Ithaca hours system when figuring out how much time a membership to a science play space should cost.  Perhaps a time bank system could be incorporated into the scheme.... thus making it incomprehensible to to people who are not used to such thing.  Still I could see some people having skills that would be really useful to the space, or having a lot of time, while others might have other skills- or things they would rather be doing with their volunteer time.  So like, if you'd rather volunteer for something else, but someone else would rather work at the space, they could exchange.

I just love a new idea.

About my little star:  well he said he didn't want to wear a diaper at night, so I let him try it.  I put him in a bunch of clothing because it was quite cold last night- the first time its dropped below 40F this year, and had him wear his wearable fleece blanket.  So despite being soaking wet in the morning, he managed to sleep all night and not get his bed wet.  Still... I think he's not ready to give up diapers at night yet.
He's barely ready in the day- still not telling me when to go, still having lot of accidents, and still resistant at times.

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Thinking about education and character development

I was up a little late last night having a discussion with my husband about an article I sent him from the NYT:


Published: September 14, 2011
Why our children’s success — and happiness — may depend less on perfect performance than on learning how to deal with failure.
(Read the article so the post below won't be confusing- the headline is not very descriptive of what is actually in the article)
I read it and thought that the way they have framed the ideas is interesting.   They way they have defined character education, as well, is intriguing.  And, most interesting is the way they talked about implementing the same ideas in two very different schools and demographics.  The ideas- that some kids seem to know how to deal with adversity and stick to things- the "successful kids", and some kids don't seem to, is not really new, but trying to implement a system to help kids learn these skills might be.  (I'm greatly simplifying here).  One of the schools is a KIPP school- and while I'm always exited to hear that these schools are working well for certain kids, I'm always slightly horrified by the methods. Still, I never realized exactly why I had this gut reaction.  I think our discussion on the article will help me articulate my thoughts-and I'll just focus on the KIPP school because, the article didn't really articulate much about how the wealthy private school was going to implement the ideas. The private school thought that having report cards on these aspects of character was never going to fly, so did not do it.
The KIPP school measures everything, so they were going to try to measure GRIT and some other aspects of character that seemed to differentiate the ones who went to college and finished it after graduating from the KIPP schools and those that didn't.
The idea in the article is that we have figured out what kids seem to need to do well in our system- the system where you go to college and become part of the elite.  So we think our job is to make kids this way.  That's the premise.  And, being part of this college educated/educator class, I immediately didn't even notice the premise and certainly did not question it... until we had our discussion. 
Here are some questions we considered: Are we training kids to be "cogs in the wheel"?  Is it a good wheel?  Can all kids be in the "elite college educated class"?  Do we want everyone to accept the system? How much of our population do we need to be always questioning the system?  Should we be training them as well?  How?  Have we ever asked the kids what they want?  Why don't they get any say in this?  Are they qualified to have any say in this? Maybe they  are, ala Kohlbeg (people do gain moral reasoning as they age).  Additionally it seems that  peer influence  can be more important than grown-up influence in forming values.  That is, peers are capable of deciding what is moral and valuable, and making choices. 
In the KIPP system (as I understand it- not claiming I have had direct experience, so this is as its portrayed in the media), the school seems to take a very top down approach- this is the way things are, and you need to learn the code, and this is how your are going to do it.  And of course kids who don't know the code (the way white college educated people interact), need the opportunity to learn it- that's what I've always admired about the KIPP approach.  What always made me nervous as the top down, almost military way of going about it. Now I'm seeing maybe my concern is the focus on being part of the elite system- not like there's anything wrong with being given the tools to be in that class- but there is something to be said for questioning the system, given tools for other paths, ... its hard to articulate, but it just seems that something is missing.  Perhaps that thing is giving students more choices and asking their opinions- more akin to those schools that are run democratically.
And perhaps this asking students for their say in things is also missing from more elitist schools.  These students are also part of the system, college is a given, and they already know the social cues they will need.  But they also are put on a particular path to uphold and hold a particular place in the current system.  The school also is telling them how to take their place there.
This post is about ideas and thing to think about. I'm sure my conclusions will change over time as I think more about education from this perspective.  We did touch on this in my teacher educations classes, but over time, when you are embedded in a particular system you forget how to think about it as an outsider.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Why has parenting changed?

I've read a lot about "modern" parenting (at least of that of the people who are not near the poverty line).  I'm not sure what proportion of the population I speaking to here, but its people like me who waited until our thirties to have kids, who have at least a college degree, and expect our spouses to change diapers.  Most of my high school class at our 20 year reunion had a child (their first) under 5 years old. We are people who think very carefully about how we going to be a parent (or at least read about in the NYT and talk to our friends about it).  We all know things have changed- unlike in the past, we make sure our kids are more safe (no wandering the neighborhood- now we have play dates; playgrounds are safer, we use car seats, etc.)  We parent in ways that are less like how our parents did it- ie we are more lenient and less authoritarian (at least that's how its perceived).  We try not to say "NO" and tell our kids what they can do, give our kids choices rather than relying on reward and punishment.   I could make this list longer, but you can add your own stuff.

I used to think this was all about that some of us (OK, me) chose to have children, and we want to take on the responsibility of our choice- we want to do it right.  We might only have one of them, as well.  In other words, we invest a lot of emotion and often research into doing it "right".

I know parenting is always changing, and often we think of the changes as reactions to the generation before.  There is some of that, but I don't think that's really what is going on here.  Some people (like myself) are not really unhappy with the way they were raised, but still they expect that life is different now, and the ideals for child raising are changing.  What is different?

Are we more judgmental?  It sounds like we are.  But why is that?  Is it because we realize that we all pay the costs as society for poor parenting? I don't think so.  If we did we would support programs that support good parenting and make sure kids are safe, healthy, and not hungry.  Is it because we are more concerned about our children's peers?  Perhaps, but I think that has always been a concern- that is why we send our kids to the "right school" or live in the "right neighborhood" if we can.  And at the same time, we are less judgmental about certain things- religion, race, gender....we are more tolerant of differences here.

And I think its all related.  One of my friends told me how she wished we'd been told to really consider our spouse's family life/expectations and experiences before we married them.  A lot of people are now raising children with people who had utterly different experiences of culture, discipline, wealth... growing up, and thus somehow they have to find common ground to raise children.  I think this quest to raise children with somebody who might not share your expectations for how children should be raised brings on this questing to find the "best" way to raise a child, and to invest a lot of effort into figuring it out.  You not only have to convince yourself and your parents that you are doing it right, but you have to convince that spouse that didn't grow up like you did.  And if you've put in all this effort to figure it, out, you might feel that you have some grounds for judging others.

In older generations, mixing of class, race, etc was less common, and even when it happened, generally, the women was seen as the primary caregiver who made the decisions about child rearing.  People seemed to be more invested in community (church, and other civics), and shared more values and norms that did not have to be discussed.  They were clear and obvious.  Even if you didn't do them, you knew what you were supposed to do.

Now we are mixing across sub cultures more than ever, we don't necessarily share values and norms with our neighbors.  Additionally, the father is supposed to be included in the decision making.  Its a recipe for conflict, but also for spending the time and energy to think very carefully about what we are doing, and what really is best for the child.  Parents are also older now, so that they have had a lot more time to think about everything.  Perhaps they are wiser, perhaps not, but their world view is that of a thirty-something than than a 20-something year old. Combine the mixing of cultures with an awareness of how important the physical environment is to your child's health (now we know that lead and other chemicals or nutrition can have serious effects), and smaller families that allow more effort to be focused on one or two children, its no wonder we raise our children differently than our parents did.  We've had to think more carefully about it, make different compromises with our spouses, are aware of many more dangers than we used to be, and are investing in a much smaller number of children.

On an unrelated note: my science play space project just lost its possible free space-  the people we were supposed to share the building with just decided to close their business.  This development might have advantages...depends on what other space we get.  We could use the time to build our base, so its not really horrible. One of our grant deadlines got extended a lot (unrelated, but welcome, since the deadline was tomorrow!)

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Diaries, games, and sports

I just said I had nothing to post.  Well, I just spent a little time putting my most recent blog posts into my new diary writing program.  I like it. Its much better organized than a blog.  I decided to put the blog posts in the program.  I sometimes back up the blog, but realized the back-up is entirely dependent on google's blog software.  Its not like it exports into a text file or something.  I don't like that.  I expect software to change over time, and I don't want to lose access because google decides someday not to support it.  So I figure, but putting posts in my diary (since they are journal entries anyway), I'll have access to them no matter what.  The journal can export to RTF format, so when that software goes away (its free after all), I'll still have the stuff.

I noticed a blog post really is different than a diary post.  I really say different things, and I imagine I think harder about my blog posts.

I realized I had a semi-interesting conversation with my husband today.  I took my son to a party at the neighbors.  The birthday boy was turning six- quite a bit older than my little star, and most of the friends were aged 5-7, so they did games that were advanced for my little star- which is why I stayed at the party with him.

At one point they did this game with water balloons where each child had to carry it with a big spoon (they were small).  My son didn't really get a turn, but I got him a water balloon at the end, and a ladle.  He was quite enjoying himself as the other kids were all popping the balloons.  Then one of the bigger kids came to him and somehow asked for his balloon...or maybe took it- it was the last unpopped balloon that kid had access to.  And then the kid played with it and threw it so it popped.  My son just looked confused and a bit sad, but didn't say anything.  I felt so bad for not intervening, but I wasn't sure if I should have intervened.  I felt sad- my little star was really enjoying that balloon... but he didn't even cry, so maybe I'm just putting my thoughts on him.  I would have been really upset.  Then again, I would never have let the other boy take the balloon in the first place.

So I noticed that a lot of the games involved kids lining up and competing with the kid at the head of the other line. It involved a lot of waiting around for most kids.  I thought this is kind of stupid for a birthday party, but then I thought maybe they are learning an important skill- to watch others be the center of attention, and wait their turn.  The older kids were good at it and enjoyed it.  They were not bored.

I asked my husband what he thought about sports where there is a lot of waiting around like that.  He didn't give me a clear answer, but I think I decided there was some merit to it... but perhaps a sport like Soccer where maybe you don't get the ball, but you are still active could be good.  Sports, I remind myself, are about more than just physical activity- and they do have their merits.

short note

In case anyone is wondering about my silence... I've had nothing to say.  I started to write an entry and it was just too boring. It was like... I got up I went on a walk, my little star napped  in his BED (which I admit is pretty exciting to me at least), ... and not much else.
So no entry means, nothing worth writing... or at least nothing I'm willing to share with you.
In fact, I got a free diary application today, so I can write things I can't share with you.  I was really pissed off at some unnamed person today...this weekend.
Sorry about that.